info@woodslane.com.au
Contact us on (02) 8445 2300
For all customer service and order enquiries

WOODSLANE

Popular Subjects

Woodslane Online Catalogues

9781666910636 Add to Cart Academic Inspection Copy

A Critical Evaluation of "Territorial Separation" as a Method of Address

The Case of Kirkuk
Description
Author
Biography
Table of
Contents
Reviews
Google
Preview
A Critical Evaluation of "Territorial Separation" as a Method of Addressing Ethnic Conflicts focuses on the reasons that have contributed to ethnic conflicts in Kirkuk. In the book, Ako S. Jalal addresses geographic, economic, political, and social factors., He argues in the outcome of the research that the previous applied methods like power sharing and Constitution rewriting could not address ethnic conflicts effectively. Finally, Jalal proves through the research hypothesis that the basic method to address ethnic conflicts in Kirkuk is territorial separation.
Ako S. Jalal is independent scholar in Middle Eastern studies and Kurdish studies.
Chapter 1: Fieldwork and Methodology Approach Chapter 2: Understanding the Issues of Kirkuk as the Center of Disputed Areas Chapter 3: The Impact of Unclear Territorial Governance of Kirkuk on Ethnic Conflicts Post-2003 Chapter 4: Understanding the Core Issues of Kirkuk since 2014 Chapter 5: The Failed Methods and the Best Option to Settle the Issue of Kirkuk Chapter 6: Territorial Separation: Options of Implementation in Kirkuk Chapter 7: Conclusions and Findings
This enlightening empirical study of Kirkuk examines territorial separation as a successful way to reduce the ethnic conflict that has plagued this contested area in Iraq since its creation. These findings also have relevance for other conflicts such as Belfast, Nicosia, and Jerusalem. -- Michael M. Gunter, Tennessee Tech University
Google Preview content