info@woodslane.com.au
Contact us on (02) 8445 2300
For all customer service and order enquiries

WOODSLANE

Popular Subjects

Woodslane Online Catalogues

9781793623300 Add to Cart Academic Inspection Copy

American Public Opinion and the Modern Supreme Court, 1930-2020

A Representative Institution
Description
Author
Biography
Table of
Contents
Reviews
Google
Preview
The United States Supreme Court is commonly thought to be an institution far removed from American public opinion. Yet nearly two-thirds of modern Supreme Court decisions reflect popular attitudes. Comparing over 500 Supreme Court decisions with timely nationwide poll questions since the mid-1930s, Thomas R. Marshall shows that most Supreme Court decisions agree with poll majorities or pluralities across time and across issues and often represent Americans' views to the same degree as federal policymakers. This book looks beyond the litigants, economic interests, social movements, organized interest groups, or units of governments typically involved and instead examines how well the Court or the justices represent Americans' views. Using nationwide public opinion, broken down by key subgroups, race, gender, education, and party affiliation, better describes exactly whom Supreme Court decisions and the justices' individual votes best represent. His book will be of interest to scholars in political science, legal studies, history, and sociology.
Thomas R. Marshall is professor of political science at the University of Texas at Arlington.
Chapter 1: Viewing the Supreme Court as a Representative Institution Chapter 2: Measuring the Supreme Court's Representative Role Chapter 3: The Norm of Representation Chapter 4: The Justices' Representative Role Chapter 5: Representing Group Opinions Chapter 6: Representation, Public Opinion, and the Modern Court
An extraordinary, one-of-a-kind analysis comparing hundreds of public opinion polls since the 1930s on issues before the Supreme Court to the Court's decisions. The two are closer than might be expected, one of the findings in a comprehensive study of a critical linkage in democratic representation. -- William Crotty, Northeastern University Marshall draws on hundreds of poll questions on specific decisions to demonstrate the modern Supreme Court represents American public opinion. The author traces this patten of representation primarily to a handful of ideologically flexible justices whose votes reflect American attitudes on specific issues. Compiling an invaluable wealth of data on the topic, this book is the most detailed polling-based account of the Supreme Court to date. -- Kayla Canelo, University of Texas at Arlington
Google Preview content