Contact us on (02) 8445 2300
For all customer service and order enquiries

Woodslane Online Catalogues

A Balanced Epistemological Orientation for the Social Sciences

Description
Author
Biography
Table of
Contents
Reviews
Google
Preview
A Balanced Epistemological Orientation for the Social Sciences challenges social researchers to rethink the epistemological assumptions grounding their work. It reviews the strengths and weaknesses of four salient epistemological orientations in the field - positivism, relativism, interpretivism, and intersubjectivism - to identify the characteristics of a theoretically-informed epistemology for social science. Relying on such an epistemology means seeking a deeper understanding of the social world without losing sight of the constructed nature of one's conceptual frames. It involves adopting a reflexive position with regard to the norms and traditions in one's area of specialization and in the field as a whole. Epistemologically-balanced social research is neither the dispassionate gathering of factual information, nor the elaboration of universal assessments formed on the basis of armchair speculation. It involves engaging in inquiry in an independent manner and being aware of the perspectival character of the claims being made in the attempt to shed new light on social phenomena. The caliber of social science can be elevated when researchers recognize the symbolic nature of their work and the significance of their conclusions in the larger social order.
Charles F. Gattone is associate professor of sociology at the University of Florida
Introduction 1: Positivism: Cutting Through the Myths 2: Relativism: Truth in the Eye of the Beholder 3: Interpretivism: Finding Meaning in Everyday Life 4: Intersubjectivism: The Quest for Common Ground 5: A Balanced Epistemological Orientation for the Social Sciences Bibliography
This book is a remarkable project and contains a body of excellent critique and argument, constituting a concise and accurate analysis of the topic. The book draws on the epistemological tradition of modernity, but introduces a novel argument making it a strong competitor among any book dealing with the epistemology of the twentieth and the twenty-first centuries. The book makes a significant contribution to the literature because it draws a comparison between dominant epistemological trends. -- Anastasia Marinopoulou, Hellenic Open University
Google Preview content