Contact us on (02) 8445 2300
For all customer service and order enquiries

Woodslane Online Catalogues

9781793638922 Add to Cart Academic Inspection Copy

Bringing Good Even Out of Evil

Thomism and the Problem of Evil
Description
Author
Biography
Table of
Contents
Reviews
Google
Preview
The question of whether the existence of evil in the world is compatible with the existence of an all-knowing, all-powerful, all-good God has been debated for centuries. Many have addressed classical arguments from evil, and while recent scholarship in analytic philosophy of religion has produced newer formulations of the problem, most of these newer formulations rely on a conception of God that is not held by all theists. In Bringing Good Even Out of Evil: Thomism and the Problem of Evil, B. Kyle Keltz defends classical theism against contemporary problems of evil through the philosophy of Thomas Aquinas and his interpreters. Keltz discusses Aquinas's thought on God, evil, and what kind of world God would make, then turns to contemporary problems of evil and shows how they miss the mark when it comes to classical theism. Some of the newer formulations that the book considers include James Sterba's argument from the Pauline principle, J. L. Schellenberg's divine hiddenness argument, Stephen Law's evil-god challenge, and Nick Trakakis's anti-theodicy.
B. Kyle Keltz is associate professor of English and philosophy at South Plains College.
Introduction Chapter One: Aquinas on God and Evil Chapter Two: Aquinas and Natural Evil Chapter Three: Aquinas and Moral Evil Chapter Four: Logical Arguments from Evil Chapter Five: Evidential Arguments from Evil Chapter Six: Anti-Theodicies Conclusion
Keltz offers his readers a sophisticated discussion of a long standing theological and philosophical problem. Unlike some who have discussed this problem, he is well aware of the significance that Aquinas has when trying to deal with it. And he puts this knowledge to very good effect in what he writes. The result is a fine introduction to the problem and to insights from Aquinas concerning it. -- Brian Davies, Fordham University
Google Preview content